SolDataLab

SOL Weekly News Review — October 5–11, 2026

2026-10-12 · Weekly News Review · SolDataLab Research Desk

The streak that defined the quarter ended, and the week made it look almost small by comparison. SOL closed at $110.00, down 9.5% - its worst week in the tracked series - as a broad risk-off wave took Bitcoin down 4.1% and Ethereum down 8.1%, and US spot Solana ETFs posted their first negative week since launch: -$24.8 million, with redemptions on all five sessions. The reversal was not Solana's alone - Bitcoin funds shed $681 million and Ether funds $542 million across the same five days, roughly $1.25 billion leaving the three categories together. But the week also produced the opposite kind of news. Solana's 200ms slot time went live at epoch 1053, completing SIMD-0525; the Solana Foundation shipped an open-source delivery-versus-payment framework built with J.P. Morgan input; Securitize brought twelve US equities on-chain; Samsung said it will route cross-border USDC over Solana through Wallet; and the count of Solana addresses holding stablecoins passed 14 million. Price fell while the plumbing thickened. Below, the week's stories, each with the numbers and the take.

The week in one paragraph

SOL walked from $121.52 on Monday to $109.07 by Saturday - a $12.45 slide - before a modest Sunday bounce to $110.00, a 9.5% weekly decline against a Bitcoin that fell 4.1% and an Ethereum that fell 8.1%. The break was technical before it was macro: SOL lost the $116 support level on Thursday and printed a -5.8% step into Friday, with roughly $21 million of long liquidations in a single hour. TVL slipped 5.9% to $6.22 billion, DEX volume fell 20.9% to $12.88 billion, network fees fell 15.8% to $99.59 million, and Jito tips eased to $2.88 million. Stablecoin supply dropped 2.9% to $16.33 billion, with USDC down 8.5% to $6.80 billion - its first decline in three weeks - while USDT edged up to $2.90 billion. The ETF complex turned negative for the first time since launch. Every figure is machine-fetched from DefiLlama or the sources attributed below.

The week's data snapshot

MetricValueSource
SOL weekly close$110.00 (-9.5%)DefiLlama
Weekly high / low close$121.52 / $109.07 (range +218%)DefiLlama
Relative performance-5.4pp vs BTC, -1.4pp vs ETHDefiLlama
TVL$6.22B (-5.9%)DefiLlama
DEX volume (7d)$12.88B (-20.9%)DefiLlama
Network fees (7d)$99.59M (-15.8%)DefiLlama
Jito MEV tips (7d)$2.88M (-1.0%)DefiLlama
Stablecoins total$16.33B (-2.9%, first decline in three weeks)DefiLlama
USDC / USDT on Solana$6.80B (-8.5%) / $2.90B (+2.0%)DefiLlama
ETF net flows (Oct 5-9)-$24.8M (SoSoValue); -$25.0M (Farside)SoSoValue / Farside

The through-line: this was the week the demand channel and the price finally agreed, in the wrong direction, and the week the builders kept shipping anyway. Solana ETFs had carried the institutional narrative for fourteen weeks; the fifteenth broke the run. But the same five sessions delivered a completed protocol upgrade, a brand-new settlement standard, an on-chain equity launch and a consumer-payments partnership - the kind of infrastructure that does not show up in a price chart for months. The two halves of this week are why this site reads Solana on two clocks: the tape, and the build.

1. The ETF inflow streak ended at fourteen - the first negative week since launch

US spot Solana ETFs recorded net outflows of $24.8 million in the week of October 5 - 9 on the SoSoValue tally (The Block's reading), the first negative week since the funds listed. A second tally on different settlement conventions, Farside Investors, puts the week at -$25.0 million - the same sign, essentially the same size. Redemptions landed on all five sessions, which The Block records as the longest daily outflow run these funds have had. The single largest day was Monday at -$9.2 million, with the next four sessions printing -$3.7 million, -$4.8 million, -$3.5 million and -$3.8 million on the Farside table. Sources: The Block via SoSoValue; Farside Investors.

The concentration is the story inside the story. Bitwise's BSOL - the largest fund in the group - accounted for about $20.9 million of the week's redemptions, roughly 84% of the entire category, its heaviest weekly outflow on record. Grayscale's GSOL shed $3.7 million on October 6 and Fidelity's FSOL $2.1 million on October 5, while Morgan Stanley's MSOL was the lone material gainer at +$1.8 million on October 8; the remaining funds recorded no net movement. Group net assets fell to roughly $1.73 billion from $1.90 billion.

Context keeps the number proportionate. This was a broad institutional de-risking week, not a Solana-specific verdict: Bitcoin ETFs lost $681.1 million and Ether ETFs lost $542.1 million, with BlackRock's ETHA alone accounting for $477 million of the latter. The Solana complex's cumulative inflows remain far larger than any single week's redemption, and one negative week does not undo a fourteen-week accumulation - but the fourteen-week streak was the cleanest demand argument the bulls had, and it is now a fact of the past rather than a fact of the present.

My take: The streak breaking is the headline, but the number I keep is the concentration: one fund produced 84% of the outflow. That cuts both ways you would expect. You cannot call -$24.8M a category-wide verdict when it is largely one product's redemption in a week when Bitcoin funds lost $681M and Ether funds lost $542M - this was systemic de-risking, and Solana was the smallest slice of it. But you also cannot wave it away, because fourteen straight positive weeks was the cleanest demand argument on the board and it is now in the past tense. The sign of next week's print, while the rest of the complex stabilizes, is what separates noise from a turn.

2. SOL fell 9.5% and broke the $116 support on the way down

The daily-close series (DefiLlama, each point the price at 00:00 UTC of the labelled date) shows the shape precisely: nearly flat into midweek ($121.52, $120.76, $120.68), then a -3.7% step into Thursday at $116.23 and a -5.8% step into Friday at $109.51, before Saturday's $109.07 low and Sunday's $110.00. That is a 9.5% weekly decline on the rounded figures and a $64.8 billion market cap on 589.1 million circulating SOL (CoinMarketCap). Against the majors, SOL lagged by 5.4 percentage points on Bitcoin (-4.1% for the week) and 1.4 points on Ethereum (-8.1%) - the second consecutive week of relative weakness.

The mechanics were classic forced selling. Analysts flagged the loss of $116 as the trigger - market commentators had set that level as the line to hold - and the break fed a liquidation cascade: roughly $21 million of Solana long liquidations in a single hour on October 8 (TokenPost), with volume spiking as leveraged positions unwound. Bitcoin dominance rose toward 59.6%, the signature of a defensive rotation out of altcoins rather than a Solana-specific exit. On the daily-close series this site tracks, the week's low close of $109.07 sits below the level SOL carried into the week - the pullback gave back the prior advance in full and then some.

My take: I have watched this token hold $116 like a load-bearing wall for a week, so the break matters mechanically as much as directionally. The level everyone was watching gave way, roughly $21 million of longs liquidated in an hour, and forced selling into a thin book did the rest. Strip the drama out and the structure is simple: -5.4 points against Bitcoin, the widest give-up of the nine-week window, and a second lagging week in a row. I do not call a regime on two weeks. I do watch relative performance first in a drawdown, because that is where leadership changes announce themselves.

3. The 200ms slot time went live - SIMD-0525 is complete

On October 9, Solana's target slot time dropped to 200 milliseconds at epoch 1053, closing out SIMD-0525 - the proposal that has now taken the network from 400ms down through 350ms, 300ms and 250ms to 200ms. Anza, the team behind the Agave validator client, confirmed the activation shortly after the epoch boundary and called it 'mission accomplished', noting that blocks now 'land twice as often as they did at genesis' and that an epoch 'takes about a day instead of two'. The SIMD was authored by Anza's Brennan Watt. Source: Anza; solana.com slot-time tracker; Solana Compass epoch data.

The critical nuance is that cadence doubled while capacity did not. Per-slot compute limits were cut in step - a 250ms slot carried up to 62.5 million compute units, a 200ms slot carries 50 million - so total execution budget per second is roughly unchanged at about 250 million compute units across both configurations. What improves is confirmation latency: five block-production opportunities per second instead of 2.5, a validator's nominal four-slot window halved from 1.6 seconds to 800ms, and blockhash validity trimmed from 60 seconds to roughly 30. And as with each prior step, the realized number runs a little slow: the first full epoch after activation averaged about 218 milliseconds per slot, against the 200ms target, consistent with the overshoot the earlier reductions showed. This is a cadence upgrade, not a throughput upgrade - and the throughput axis is Alpenglow's job, still unscheduled.

My take: This is the upgrade I would point to when someone says Solana is only about price. 200 millisecond slots went live at epoch 1053 and completed a four-step reduction from 400ms - and the part almost every headline got wrong is that capacity did not move. Per-slot compute budgets were cut in step, so execution per second is unchanged; what changed is how often the chain offers a block. That is a latency upgrade for the people who quote prices and route payments, and an operational tightening for validators. Finality is a separate axis, still 12.8 seconds, still waiting on Alpenglow. Read the cadence, not the throughput.

4. The Solana Foundation shipped an open-source DvP settlement standard

On October 6 the Solana Foundation unveiled Solana DvP, an open-source delivery-versus-payment framework that settles a tokenized asset and its cash leg in a single atomic transaction. In a DvP trade the securities and the cash change hands at the same instant, or neither does - the framework implements that atomically through isolated escrow, so the transaction either completes in full or fails in full, and neither counterparty is exposed to the other delivering and not being paid. J.P. Morgan contributed to the standard during development, helping shape it around institutional settlement requirements, and the released standard is audited. The target use cases are tokenized stocks, funds and other real-world assets. Sources: Solana Foundation; Bitcoin.com News roundup.

The significance is not the code - escrow-based atomic swaps are as old as smart contracts - it is the packaging. Institutions do not adopt mechanisms; they adopt standards with an audit trail and a recognizable counterparty at the table. A Foundation-blessed, J.P. Morgan-reviewed DvP spec gives legal and operations teams something to point at, which is the actual bottleneck in moving real-world assets on-chain. It arrived one day before the week's larger tokenization headline - and it is the piece that makes that headline settleable.

My take: Standards are the least glamorous part of crypto and the most decisive part of adoption, which is why an audited DvP spec with J.P. Morgan's fingerprints is a bigger deal than it reads. Escrow-based atomic swaps are ancient; the scarce thing is a specification a bank's legal team can describe to a regulator and map to its own settlement workflow. That is what shipped on October 6. It will not show up in a price chart for a year, and it did more for the institutional case than any single week of ETF inflows - because flows are demand, and standards are permission.

5. Securitize brought twelve US equities on-chain, settled in USDC

On October 8, the tokenization firm Securitize launched 'Securitize Stocks', bringing an initial twelve US-listed companies - among them Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, Nvidia, Tesla, Circle, Strategy and Palantir - onto Solana through a new product. Each stock token is backed 1:1 by an actual share, structured to preserve the applicable economic rights including dividends and voting, and settles in USDC; Jump Trading provides liquidity. The securities entitlements are designed to support a conversion path to conventional share ownership as issuer-sponsored tokenization matures. Securitize is an established, regulated tokenization platform rather than a proof-of-concept. Sources: Securitize; CoinDesk via BlockBeats and Foresight News.

The distribution plan is the interesting part: the tokens are expected to reach the New York Stock Exchange's planned 24/7 digital trading venue and OKXICE, the tokenized-securities venue being built by ICE (the NYSE's parent) with OKX. A stablecoin-settled equity that trades on both an on-chain venue and a regulated exchange's digital arm is the bridge product the tokenization thesis has been promising - and it runs, for now, on Solana rails. Access remains gated by KYC/AML, jurisdictional eligibility and securities law, so early liquidity will be thin; the point this week is that the rail exists.

My take: Twelve US equities, each backed one-to-one by a real share, settled in USDC, with a path to the NYSE's digital venue - that is the most concrete tokenized-equity product on Solana to date, and the structure is deliberately conservative, which I read as a feature rather than a limitation. Economic rights without a register entry is the wrapper that can exist today under current rules; the conversion path is the upgrade. The honest caveat is liquidity: twelve tickers with gated access and thin books is a starting line, not a market. I will take it seriously when a settlement volume number exists.

6. Samsung said it will route cross-border USDC over Solana

On October 8, Solana's official account announced that Samsung Wallet users in the United States will be able to send money across borders using USDC on Solana, beginning the last week of October - a reach of roughly 82 million US Galaxy devices. The partnership slots into the same week's DvP and securities-venue news to sketch a single thesis: Solana as the settlement layer for both institutional assets and consumer dollars. Source: Solana on X, October 8, 2026.

A pre-installed wallet on tens of millions of devices is a different distribution channel from an exchange listing, and the stablecoin-on-Solana framing is deliberate - the rails, not the token. Whether it moves volume depends on fee and FX economics that the announcement did not detail. But for a week in which the price fell 9.5%, the payments leg kept getting longer, and that asymmetry is worth holding onto.

My take: A pre-installed wallet on 82 million devices is distribution no exchange listing can buy, and the framing - stablecoin as the asset, Solana as the rail - is exactly right. What the announcement did not say is the fee and FX spread, and that is the whole ballgame for cross-border payments. Plenty of consumer crypto corridors have launched and died on economics. I file this as a real channel with an unproven price, and I watch whether it ships on schedule in late October.

7. Stablecoin holders topped 14 million - a record the supply series did not match

On October 7, the number of unique Solana addresses holding stablecoins passed 14.02 million, an all-time high. Cumulative volume on stablecoin-linked cards on the network also crossed $1 billion. The milestone landed the day after the DvP framework release, and it tells a story the supply series does not: the number of people (or at least addresses) touching dollars on Solana kept climbing even as the dollar value on the network eased. Sources: Bitcoin.com News roundup; CryptoCortex.

The counterweight is in this week's own data: total stablecoin supply on Solana fell 2.9% to $16.33 billion, with USDC down 8.5% to $6.80 billion on the week. So more holders and less supply - new, smaller, and mostly fee-only participants arriving while larger balances rotated out or converted. More addresses is not more people (one user can control many), and this site treats the holder count as a distribution signal, not a demand signal. The demand signal this week pointed the other way.

My take: Fourteen million addresses holding stablecoins is a genuine distribution milestone - and it is the metric I would flag to a payments skeptic, because you have to move real dollars onto a chain to hold a stablecoin there. But set it against this week's supply data and the caution is immediate: total stablecoin supply fell 2.9% and USDC dropped 8.5%, so the number of holders rose while the money shrank. More, smaller, mostly fee-paying participants is a distribution story, not a demand story. I will not let one metric do the work of both.

8. Addresses surged 124% - and it did not move the price, for good reasons

New addresses on Solana surged, with analytics firm Santiment putting the increase at 124% - roughly 1.71 million new wallets created per day. The same week the token fell 9.5%. The divergence is not a paradox once you look at what the metric counts: an address is a free, instant-to-create public account, so the count is inflated by airdrop farmers running multiple wallets, trading bots, and exchanges managing many accounts. Most new participants, meanwhile, come to trade stablecoins or tokenized stocks - and a stablecoin trader needs only a trivial amount of SOL for fees, not a position in it. Source: Santiment via 24/7 Wall St.

The lesson is structural rather than bearish: on a chain cheap enough to make address-creation and transactions nearly free, wallet counts and transaction counts decouple from token demand. The metric this site weights instead is paid fees and tips - the part of activity that costs real money and cannot be faked by spinning up wallets. That series fell with everything else this week, but it fell far less than volume, which is the subject of the data report in this week's edition.

My take: The address surge is the most misread number of the week, and I want to be precise about why. A 124% jump in new addresses sounds like adoption until you remember an address is free and instant to create, so airdrop farmers, bots and exchange bookkeeping all inflate it. Meanwhile most new participants come for stablecoins and tokenized stocks and need almost no SOL to transact. The lesson is not that growth is fake; it is that wallet counts and token demand are different questions. The series that answers the demand question is paid fees, and I weight that one accordingly.

Three stories that mattered most

Eight items make a long list, so here is where I would spend attention if I could only follow three:

  1. The ETF streak ending (item 1). Fourteen straight positive weeks became the first negative print, dominated by one fund, in a week when the whole complex sold off. Whether week sixteen rebounds or extends is the single cleanest read on whether the institutional bid is a trend or a moment.
  2. The settlement build under the falling tape (items 3-5). A completed 200ms upgrade, an audited DvP standard, twelve tokenized equities and a device-scale payments partner all landed in the same week the token fell 9.5%. Infrastructure and price run on different clocks; this week made the gap visible, and the build is the half that compounds.
  3. The gap between price and structure (items 2, 7-8). The token lost a tenth of its value while the stake base, the yield stack and the fee ratio barely moved, and while wallet and holder counts kept climbing. Which series is telling the truth about Solana - the quote or the plumbing - is the question the next month answers.

What I'm watching next week

A week that broke a streak, a support level and a stretch of calm hands the next one an unusually clean set of questions.

Source: DefiLlama - Solana prices, TVL, DEX volume, fees, stablecoinsThe Block via SoSoValue - Solana ETF flows, week of October 5-9, 2026Farside Investors - second-tally Solana ETF flow table (settlement-convention differences)Solana Compass - 200ms slot time live at epoch 1053; ETF outflow reportingAnza - SIMD-0525 completion at epoch 1053; slot-time upgrade trackerSolana Foundation - open-source DvP settlement framework, with J.P. Morgan input (Oct 6, 2026)CoinDesk via BlockBeats / Foresight News - Securitize Stocks: 12 US equities on Solana (Oct 8, 2026)Solana on X - Samsung Wallet USDC cross-border partnership announcement (Oct 8, 2026)Bitcoin.com News roundup - Solana stablecoin holders pass 14 million (Oct 7, 2026)24/7 Wall St - Solana addresses up 124% via Santiment; SOL -9% on ETF outflows (Oct 10, 2026)CoinMarketCap - SOL circulating supply, 24h volume

Did Solana ETFs really post their first negative week?

Yes. US spot Solana ETFs recorded -$24.8 million in the week of October 5-9 on the SoSoValue tally (The Block), or -$25.0 million on Farside's table - the first negative week since the funds listed, ending a fourteen-week inflow streak. Redemptions landed on all five sessions, the longest daily outflow run the funds have had; Bitwise's BSOL accounted for roughly 84% of the total.

Why did SOL fall 9.5% this week?

Two overlapping forces. Macro: a broad risk-off wave took Bitcoin down 4.1% and Ethereum down 8.1%, and Bitcoin dominance rose toward 59.6% as capital rotated out of altcoins. Technical: SOL lost the $116 support level on October 8 and the break triggered a liquidation cascade - roughly $21 million of long liquidations in a single hour - pushing the daily-close series from $121.52 to $109.07 by Saturday.

What did the 200ms slot time actually change?

Cadence, not throughput. Solana's target slot time fell from 250ms to 200ms at epoch 1053 on October 9, completing SIMD-0525's four-step reduction from 400ms. Block-production opportunities per second doubled from 2.5 to 5, the validator's four-slot window halved from 1.6s to 800ms, and blockhash validity dropped from 60s to ~30s. Per-slot compute budgets were cut proportionally (62.5M to 50M CU), so execution capacity per second is roughly unchanged at ~250M compute units.

What is Solana DvP and why does J.P. Morgan's involvement matter?

Solana DvP is an open-source delivery-versus-payment framework released October 6 that settles a tokenized asset and its cash leg in one atomic transaction via isolated escrow - either both sides move or neither does. J.P. Morgan contributed to the standard during development, which matters less for the code than for adoption: institutional teams adopt audited standards with recognizable counterparties, not novel mechanisms.

If 14 million addresses now hold stablecoins on Solana, why did stablecoin supply fall?

Because holders and balances are different metrics, and this week they diverged. Unique stablecoin-holding addresses hit a record 14.02 million on October 7, but total stablecoin supply fell 2.9% to $16.33 billion and USDC dropped 8.5% to $6.80 billion. More, smaller, mostly fee-paying participants arrived while larger balances rotated out - a distribution signal, not a demand signal.

What is the single most important thing to watch next week?

Whether the ETF outflow repeats. The fourteen-week streak was the cleanest institutional-demand argument the market had; a second consecutive negative week would mark a turn in that layer rather than a single risk-off week, and the on-chain backstops - fees, tips and the dollar base - would have to carry the thesis alone.

Need on-chain energy without the price tag?

Rent TRON Energy at Tronsell →

A service we run and trust: a ~400M TRX self-operated energy pool, with 60-90% savings versus on-chain energy costs.

Tags: SOL ETFNetworkStablecoinDeFi