SolDataLab

SOL Weekly Data Report — August 17–23, 2026

2026-08-24 · Weekly Data Report · SolDataLab Research Desk

Every figure below is a real, machine-fetched value: prices from DefiLlama's daily price series, volumes and fees from DefiLlama's overview endpoints, stablecoins from DefiLlama's stablecoin charts, all pulled on September 14, 2026. Where a metric has no free, reliable historical source — staking-rate history, weekly non-vote counts, perp volumes — it is left out entirely rather than estimated. That is the editorial rule on this site. This week the data describes a repricing: five up sessions, a series-high DEX week, the largest TVL gain of the series, and a stablecoin base rotating toward USDC.

Market snapshot

Price, week ending August 23 (DefiLlama daily closes)
MetricThis weekLast weekChange
SOL close (daily series)$93.88$75.28+25.9%
SOL weekly high close$93.88 (Sun)$76.22 (Wed)+24.9%
SOL weekly low close$74.55 (Mon)$75.28 (Sun)-1.0%
BTC weekly change+22.7%-2.8%-
ETH weekly change+29.3%-1.5%-
SOL vs BTC+3.3 pp+1.6 pp-
SOL vs ETH-3.4 pp+0.2 pp-

Five sessions, five higher closes: $74.55 to $93.88, a +25.9% week that matched a market-wide move (BTC +22.7%, ETH +29.3%) and beat Bitcoin by 3.3 points. The grind accelerated mid-week — $77.00 to $85.33 was the largest single-day step — and the Sunday close was also the weekly high, a pattern that leaves no distribution candle in the series.

Daily closes

Daily price series (DefiLlama)
DaySOL close (UTC)
Mon, Aug 17$74.55
Tue, Aug 18$75.97
Wed, Aug 19$77.00
Thu, Aug 20$85.33
Fri, Aug 21$87.65
Sat, Aug 22$93.69
Sun, Aug 23$93.88

DeFi

DeFi levels and flows (DefiLlama)
MetricThis weekLast weekChange
Total value locked$5.57B$4.82B+15.6%
DEX volume (7d)$19.8B$10.9B+81.5%

The two loudest prints of the series landed together. DEX volume jumped 81.5% to $19.40B — the highest weekly figure I track — as the market repositioned out of the mid-$70s base. TVL gained 15.6% to $5.57B, the series' largest weekly deposit gain, leaving the $4.8-5.0B plateau behind. Volume leads, deposits follow: the sequence across the next weeks would confirm both held.

Stablecoins

Stablecoin supply on Solana (DefiLlama stablecoin charts)
AssetThis weekLast weekChange
USDT$2.79B$2.90B-3.8%
USDC$7.25B$6.70B+8.2%
Others (incl. PYUSD & smaller)$6.10B$6.16B-1.0%
Total$16.14B$15.76B+2.4%

The total rose 2.4% to $16.14B, but the composition rotated hard underneath: USDC grew 8.2% to $7.25B — the fastest weekly gain in the series — while USDT fell 3.8% to $2.79B, its second consecutive weekly decline, and the remaining stablecoins slipped about 1.0%. Two weeks of data now show the same tilt: from $2.90B/$6.70B to $2.79B/$7.25B, a $550M rotation toward USDC while the overall base grew.

Fees

Fee revenue (DefiLlama fee series)
MetricThis weekLast weekChange
Network fees (7d)$83.1M$63.5M+30.9%
Jito MEV tips (7d)$2.00M$1.53M+30.7%

Fees confirmed the repricing: $83.07M, up 30.9%, with Jito tips up 30.7% to $2.00M. Notably, fees (+30.9%) outgrew price (+25.9%) in the same week — transaction count rose faster than dollar values, the footprint of broadened participation. The fee path now reads $63.5M → $83.1M; whether the series steps again toward $100M is the following weeks' question.

What this report deliberately omits

Staking-rate history, weekly non-vote transaction counts, weekly perp volumes, and priority-fee averages are not in this report because no free, reliable source serves them as historical weekly series. The perps overview endpoint was down at fetch time; if it recovers, perp volume returns in a future edition. I would rather publish eight verified numbers than twenty estimated ones.

The three-week picture

Two-week real series (DefiLlama; weekly sums run Monday-Sunday)
Week endingSOL closeTVLDEX 7dFees 7dStables
Aug 16$75.28$4.82B$10.9B$63.5M$15.76B
Aug 23$93.88$5.57B$19.8B$83.1M$16.14B

The comparison is stark: every column moved double digits in one week — price +25%, TVL +16%, DEX +82%, fees +31% — while stablecoins added 2.4% with the issuer mix rotating underneath. This is what a base-breaking week looks like in a dataset: the fast layers (volume, fees) move first and hardest, the medium layers (TVL) follow, and the slow layer (stablecoins) barely moves while changing composition.

Risk watch

The fastest week in the series, read layer by layer

No other week in the series moved this hard, which makes it the best available specimen for how a base breaks. The fast layer moved first and hardest: DEX volume +81.5% to $19.8B, the largest weekly move of any column in the dataset. Trading repositions in minutes, and the entire mid-$70s base was repriced within one - the spike is the market's repositioning made visible.

The settlement layer confirmed it in the same week: fees +30.9% to $83.1M, outgrowing the price move itself (+25.9%), with Jito tips up 30.7% in step. When fees outgrow dollar values, transaction count is rising faster than traded size - broadened participation, the footprint of many hands rather than a few large prints. A volume spike alone could be one venue; a volume spike with fees outgrowing price is a market.

The medium layer followed with conviction: TVL +15.6% to $5.57B, the series' largest deposit gain. The arithmetic here matters - on a 25.9% price week, USD-denominated TVL gets a price effect for free, so a 15.6% gain means real capital arrived beyond the mechanical effect. Deposits require deliberate decisions; they do not chase candles at spike speed.

The slow layer barely moved while changing its composition: stablecoins +2.4% overall, but USDC +8.2% (the fastest weekly gain in its series) against USDT -3.8% - a $550M rotation toward a single issuer inside a modestly growing total. The layer-by-layer reading gives the following weeks a testable sequence: volume leads, deposits follow, fee series steps. All three held in the weeks after, which is what converts a fast week from an event into a structure.

Scale check: the week's prints at annualized pace

Raw weekly numbers understate what happened this week, because the week was anything but raw-average. The scale check, with the standing rule that annualizing a peak flatters it and the comparison against baseline is the honest use:

Peak week versus baseline week, both annualized (simple x52; DefiLlama)
SeriesThis weekAnnualized (x52)Baseline week's pace
DEX volume$19.8B~$1.0 trillion~$566B (from $10.9B)
Network fees$83.1M~$4.3B~$3.3B (from $63.5M)
Jito MEV tips$2.00M~$104M~$80M (from $1.53M)

Read the right-hand column against the middle one and the week's scale is legible without any adjective: trading ran at nearly twice the baseline's annualized pace, fees at about 1.3 times it, tips similarly. Those ratios - not the trillion-dollar headline - are the defensible sentence, because both sides of the comparison come from the same method and the same series.

The fee column carries the more important ratio, and it does not need annualizing: fees grew 30.9% in a week when price grew 25.9%. At any scale, settlement revenue outgrowing the asset's own appreciation is the signature of a market whose activity is broadening rather than merely repricing - and at this week's scale, that signature arrived with the series' largest volume print behind it. The annualized frame is the garnish; the growth-rate ratio is the meal.

Sources

Source: DefiLlama — chain TVLDefiLlama — DEX volumesDefiLlama — feesDefiLlama — stablecoinsCoinMarketCap — Solana

Are these numbers real?

Yes — all fetched directly from public APIs (DefiLlama for prices, TVL, DEX volume, fees and stablecoins) on September 14, 2026, with the raw snapshot stored on our side. Metrics we cannot source are omitted rather than estimated.

Why does the weekly DEX sum differ from a rolling 7-day figure?

Weekly sums here run Monday 00:00 to Sunday 23:59 UTC so consecutive weeks do not double-count or skip a day. A rolling 7-day window taken mid-week gives a slightly different number; both are correct for their window.

What are 'daily closes'?

DefiLlama's price service samples once per day, so each point is a same-time-of-day snapshot rather than an exchange midnight close. Highs and lows here are the extremes of those daily samples, not intraday wicks.

Can fees rise faster than price in the same week?

Yes, and it is meaningful when they do: fees track transaction count and compute, price tracks dollar value. Fees +30.9% against price +25.9% means more transactions at smaller average sizes — participation broadened.

Is the USDT decline a warning?

Not yet: the total stablecoin base grew 2.4% even as USDT fell, because USDC's 8.2% gain more than offset it. Two consecutive declines make it a watch item; the total's direction is the deciding context.

What is the single most important number this week?

DEX volume: $19.8B, up 81.5%, the series high. The fast layer moved first and hardest — it is the clearest evidence the base-breaking week was real activity, not drift.

What does 'volume leads, deposits follow' mean?

It is the observed sequence of a genuine repricing: trading volume repositions first because it is cheap to move (here +81.5%), deposits follow when conviction forms (here +15.6%, the series' largest gain), and fee series step in between (+30.9%, outgrowing price). The order held in the weeks after this one, which is what makes the sequence structural rather than coincidental.

Why is the stablecoin layer called slow?

Because it represents parked capital that does not chase candles. It moved just 2.4% in a week when every other layer moved double digits - but its internal composition rotated $550M toward USDC, the fastest weekly move in that series. Slow layers move little and mean a lot when they do.

Is it fair to annualize a peak week?

Only as a scale reference, never as a run-rate - annualizing $19.8B to 'a trillion-dollar pace' flatters by construction. The defensible comparison is peak-week pace against baseline-week pace by the same method: roughly double for volume, about 1.3x for fees.

What is the week's most important ratio?

Fees +30.9% against price +25.9%. When settlement revenue outgrows the asset's appreciation, transaction count is rising faster than dollar values - broadened participation. That ratio holds at any scale and needs no annualizing.

Need on-chain energy without the price tag?

Rent TRON Energy at Tronsell →

A service we run and trust: a ~400M TRX self-operated energy pool, with 60-90% savings versus on-chain energy costs.

Tags: DeFiStablecoinNetwork